Scanning problem (different results depending on frequencies selected)
Scanning problem (different results depending on frequencies selected)
I have a 3340, fed with a multi-LNB arrangement with DISEQC switches.
I am limiting my testing to tuner 2 (DVB-S) and on that tuner just one satellite (DISEQC command AB) and am getting peculiar results. (Without repeating this exactly, it looks like I get the same result if I repeat with tuner 1).
Depending on which frequencies I select, I am either able to get the channels "Available" or they "Can not lock".
The results of three different scans are shown below...
With five frequencies selected, 11.156 and 11.627 are not available.
With three frequencies selected (and 11.156 first), then 11.156 becomes available but 11.627 remains unavailable.
With one frequency selected (11.627), then it becomes available.
Is there any explanation for this inconsistency? I would like all frequencies to be locked. Is there any finer control over the scanning process?
Thanks
I am limiting my testing to tuner 2 (DVB-S) and on that tuner just one satellite (DISEQC command AB) and am getting peculiar results. (Without repeating this exactly, it looks like I get the same result if I repeat with tuner 1).
Depending on which frequencies I select, I am either able to get the channels "Available" or they "Can not lock".
The results of three different scans are shown below...
With five frequencies selected, 11.156 and 11.627 are not available.
With three frequencies selected (and 11.156 first), then 11.156 becomes available but 11.627 remains unavailable.
With one frequency selected (11.627), then it becomes available.
Is there any explanation for this inconsistency? I would like all frequencies to be locked. Is there any finer control over the scanning process?
Thanks
Code: Select all
Satellite Frequency Polarization SR Status
Astra 1KR/1L/1M/1N (19.2E) 11.068 GHz V 22000 Available
Astra 1KR/1L/1M/1N (19.2E) 11.156 GHz V 22000 Can not lock
Astra 1KR/1L/1M/1N (19.2E) 11.509 GHz V 22000 Can not lock
Astra 1KR/1L/1M/1N (19.2E) 11.627 GHz V 22000 Can not lock
Astra 1KR/1L/1M/1N (19.2E) 11.686 GHz V 22000 Available
Code: Select all
Satellite Frequency Polarization SR Status
Astra 1KR/1L/1M/1N (19.2E) 11.156 GHz V 22000 Available
Astra 1KR/1L/1M/1N (19.2E) 11.509 GHz V 22000 Can not lock
Astra 1KR/1L/1M/1N (19.2E) 11.627 GHz V 22000 Can not lock
Code: Select all
Satellite Frequency Polarization SR Status
Astra 1KR/1L/1M/1N (19.2E) 11.627 GHz V 22000 Available
- admin@vbox
- Site Admin
- Posts: 352
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2017 11:20 am
Re: Scanning problem (different results depending on frequencies selected)
Hi @guiri
There could be a number of reasons why this is happening, to better understand the issue, can you please draw your satellite setup installation outlining all the elements for example LNB, DiSEqC switch, multi switch, cable etc...
Also please let us know the model and maker of the different elements
I hope that this will provide us with better understanding
There could be a number of reasons why this is happening, to better understand the issue, can you please draw your satellite setup installation outlining all the elements for example LNB, DiSEqC switch, multi switch, cable etc...
Also please let us know the model and maker of the different elements
I hope that this will provide us with better understanding
Re: Scanning problem (different results depending on frequencies selected)
Please refer to the diagram above. There is a single dish with three (identical) universal LNBs on a multi-LNB mount. They are positioned for Astra 2, Astra 1 and Hotbird. I do not know the model number.
Each LNB has four outputs, feeding four (identical) DISEQC switches as shown.
Astra 2 is command AA on the switch.
Astra 1 is command AB on the switch.
Hotbird is command BA on the switch.
The fourth input on the switch (command BB) is unused.
The switches are Technomate TM-4S.
I have been using the system with a Vu+ Solo2 (Linux set top box) for over a year. The Solo2 has no problem with tuning the three satellites.
I hope that helps, please let me know if you need any further information.
Re: Scanning problem (different results depending on frequencies selected)
Hi
Any ideas? Is there a tuning log file that can be accessed?
Thanks
Any ideas? Is there a tuning log file that can be accessed?
Thanks
- admin@vbox
- Site Admin
- Posts: 352
- Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2017 11:20 am
Re: Scanning problem (different results depending on frequencies selected)
Hi @guiri
Thank you for sending the diagrams
I have escalated this to the R&D for review and will get back to you
Quick question - why do you use 4 separate DiSEqC switches and not 1 with support for 2 devices?
Thank you for sending the diagrams
I have escalated this to the R&D for review and will get back to you
Quick question - why do you use 4 separate DiSEqC switches and not 1 with support for 2 devices?
Re: Scanning problem (different results depending on frequencies selected)
Hi @admin
Thanks for the escalation - could you give me some idea of timescales as I have a vbox that I can't really use at the moment until I am sure I can get it to tune properly?
With regards to your question about the choice of switches, I agree it could have been done with a multiswitch but the individual diseqc switch approach minimised the amount of cabling (as they are pole mounted under the dish) - just four cables coming off the pole into the house.
Regards
guiri
Thanks for the escalation - could you give me some idea of timescales as I have a vbox that I can't really use at the moment until I am sure I can get it to tune properly?
With regards to your question about the choice of switches, I agree it could have been done with a multiswitch but the individual diseqc switch approach minimised the amount of cabling (as they are pole mounted under the dish) - just four cables coming off the pole into the house.
Regards
guiri
Re: Scanning problem (different results depending on frequencies selected)
Hi admin, could you give me an update please?admin@vbox wrote: ↑Mon May 08, 2017 4:56 pmI have escalated this to the R&D for review and will get back to you
Thanks
Re: Scanning problem (different results depending on frequencies selected)
Any attempt to add channels leads to this result. When installing from the beginning and erasing all existing channels everything is ok.
But in case of attemp to add channel to existing channels a have this issue:

scanning:

after scanning:

is this known issue if existing firmware?
please help.
But in case of attemp to add channel to existing channels a have this issue:

scanning:

after scanning:

is this known issue if existing firmware?
please help.
Last edited by amdr1 on Sat Dec 08, 2018 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Scanning problem (different results depending on frequencies selected)
It is important to note that the channels (2527-2540)from the scanned transponder appear in the general list, but an attempt to view them leads to a network error.


Re: Scanning problem (different results depending on frequencies selected)
After manually adding relevant diseqc settings to channelList.xml the problem was solved.
But the 3332CI has a bug.
It isn't right after scan edit the files manually .
Thanks.
But the 3332CI has a bug.
It isn't right after scan edit the files manually .
Thanks.